Brand Monitoring
Brand Protection Threat Intelligence Phishing
Brand monitoring is the practice of tracking your company’s name and digital assets across the internet to detect …
Contents
Pretexting is a social engineering technique where attackers create fabricated scenarios to manipulate victims into divulging information or granting access. Unlike generic phishing, pretexting involves researched, personalized deception tailored to specific targets.
The attacker isn’t just sending a fake email. They’ve created an entire false reality. They know your name, your role, your colleagues. They’ve built a scenario that makes their request seem completely reasonable.
“Hi, this is Mike from the Seattle office. I’m covering for Sarah while she’s out. Can you help me reset my VPN access?”
Everything checks out. There is a Seattle office. Sarah is on vacation. The request seems routine. But Mike doesn’t exist.
How Does Pretexting Work?
Pretexting attacks follow a methodical process.
Target research. Attackers gather intelligence about the organization and specific victims. LinkedIn profiles reveal job titles and reporting structures. Company websites list executives and contact information. Data breaches provide personal details. This research makes the pretext believable.
Scenario construction. The attacker builds a false scenario that explains their request. They might pose as a new employee, IT support, a vendor, or an auditor. The scenario provides context that makes the request seem legitimate.
Identity creation. Attackers may create fake email addresses, phone numbers, LinkedIn profiles, or even business cards. Some register domains similar to legitimate vendors. The fabricated identity supports the pretext.
Trust establishment. The attacker uses the pretext to establish rapport and credibility. They reference real people, projects, or events. They use industry jargon correctly. Everything reinforces the false identity.
Information extraction. Once trust is established, the attacker makes their request. It might be credentials, wire transfers, physical access, or sensitive documents. The pretext makes the request seem routine.
What Do Pretexting Attacks Target?
Pretexting attacks pursue specific objectives.
Credential Theft
Attackers create scenarios requiring password resets or credential sharing. A fake IT support call about a “security incident” requests password verification. A spoofed email from a “supervisor” needs login credentials to access a shared resource while traveling.
Financial Fraud
Pretexting enables wire transfer fraud. An attacker impersonates a vendor with updated banking details. A fake executive requests an urgent payment. The pretext provides business justification for the transaction.
Physical Access
Some pretexting attacks target buildings rather than networks. Attackers pose as delivery drivers, maintenance workers, or auditors to gain facility access. Once inside, they plant devices or steal equipment.
Data Exfiltration
Attackers may pose as journalists, researchers, or business partners seeking information. The pretext justifies questions that would otherwise seem suspicious.
Real-World Pretexting Examples
These attacks demonstrate pretexting’s effectiveness.
Hewlett Packard scandal (2006). HP hired investigators who used pretexting to obtain phone records of board members and journalists. They impersonated the targets when contacting phone companies, demonstrating how pretexting exploits customer service processes.
RSA breach (2011). Attackers sent targeted emails with the subject line “2011 Recruitment Plan” to specific HR employees. The pretext of a legitimate recruiting document convinced recipients to open the attached Excel file, which contained malware that led to the compromise of RSA’s SecurID authentication system.
Ubiquiti breach (2015). Attackers impersonated executives and attorneys in emails to the finance department. The pretexting campaign resulted in $46.7 million in fraudulent wire transfers to overseas accounts.
MGM Resorts attack (2023). Attackers researched an MGM employee on LinkedIn, then called the IT helpdesk impersonating that employee. The convincing pretext led to a credential reset that enabled a ransomware attack costing over $100 million.
Pretexting Techniques
Attackers use several approaches to make pretexts convincing.
Authority Impersonation
Pretending to be executives, IT staff, auditors, or law enforcement. Authority figures receive compliance without question. “This is a request from the CEO’s office” bypasses normal verification.
Service Provider Impersonation
Posing as vendors, contractors, or service providers with existing business relationships. “I’m calling from your payroll provider about an urgent issue” exploits trusted relationships.
Peer Impersonation
Pretending to be a colleague from another office or department. “I’m new to the Chicago team and need some help” exploits collegial helpfulness.
Urgency Creation
Building time pressure into the pretext. “The auditors need this by end of day” or “the system will be down in an hour” prevents careful verification.
Technical Complexity
Creating scenarios involving technical issues victims don’t fully understand. People defer to apparent expertise and comply with requests they can’t evaluate.
How to Detect Pretexting Attempts
Train employees to recognize warning signs.
Unusual requests. Even with good pretexts, the underlying request is often unusual. Password sharing, bypassing procedures, urgent payments to new accounts.
Resistance to verification. Legitimate parties welcome verification. Pretexters discourage it. “We don’t have time for callbacks” or “just check with me directly” are red flags.
Too much detail. Pretexters often over-explain to seem legitimate. Genuine requests don’t require elaborate justification.
Inconsistencies. Details that don’t quite match. Email domains slightly wrong. Names not in the directory. Procedures that don’t align with company policy.
Emotional manipulation. Urgency, flattery, or implied threats. “I really need your help” or “the CEO will be upset if this is delayed” are pressure tactics.
How to Prevent Pretexting Attacks
Defense requires policies, training, and verification procedures.
Verification protocols. Establish procedures for verifying identities before sharing information or granting access. Use callback numbers from official directories, not numbers provided by the requester.
Security awareness training. Regular training helps employees recognize pretexting tactics. Include realistic simulations. The MGM attack succeeded because one employee trusted a caller’s pretext.
Principle of least privilege. Limit access to sensitive information and systems. Fewer people with access means fewer potential victims.
Multi-person approval. Require multiple approvals for sensitive actions like wire transfers or system access grants. This defeats pretexting against single individuals.
Credential monitoring. Dark web monitoring detects when credentials stolen through pretexting appear on criminal markets. Exposed credentials from one attack enable future attacks.
Information hygiene. Limit publicly available information that enables pretexting research. Be cautious about organizational details on websites and social media.
Pretexting vs Other Social Engineering
Pretexting often combines with other techniques.
| Technique | Focus | Pretexting Role |
|---|---|---|
| Phishing | Email-based credential theft | Provides believable context for links/attachments |
| Vishing | Voice-based manipulation | Pretext establishes caller’s false identity |
| Smishing | SMS-based attacks | Pretext explains why a text requires action |
| Baiting | Physical media with malware | Pretext explains why USB drive should be used |
Whale phishing attacks targeting executives rely heavily on pretexting. Generic phishing emails fail against security-aware executives. Personalized pretexts based on research succeed.
Conclusion
Pretexting is the foundation of targeted social engineering. Generic attacks are easily spotted. Carefully researched pretexts fool even security-conscious employees.
Defense requires verification procedures that don’t rely on information the attacker might have. When pretexting succeeds and credentials are compromised, credential monitoring catches the exposure early.
Check if your organization’s credentials are already exposed with a free dark web scan.
Pretexting FAQ
Pretexting is a social engineering technique where attackers create fabricated scenarios to manipulate victims. They build false identities and situations to establish trust. The goal is extracting sensitive information or access that victims wouldn’t normally provide.
In cybersecurity, pretexting is the foundation of targeted social engineering attacks. Attackers research targets, craft believable scenarios, and impersonate trusted entities. It enables business email compromise, vishing attacks, and physical security breaches.
Pretexting relies on trust, authority, and information asymmetry. Attackers research targets to make scenarios believable. They exploit professional courtesy and the tendency to help colleagues or authority figures. Urgency prevents victims from verifying claims.
Phishing casts a wide net with generic lures. Pretexting crafts specific scenarios for targeted victims. Phishing might send thousands of fake bank emails. Pretexting researches one executive and creates a personalized scenario exploiting their specific role and relationships.
An ‘IT auditor’ requesting system access for a compliance review. A ‘vendor’ calling accounts payable about invoice issues. A ’new employee’ asking colleagues for help accessing systems. A ‘bank representative’ verifying account details after a supposed breach. Each scenario establishes false context.