
Leaked Emails: Where They Appear & How to Respond
Dark Web Monitoring Credential Monitoring Data Breach
What Are Leaked Emails? Most security teams think about leaked emails as a consumer problem. Check your personal email …

Learn how to stop insider threats before employees steal sensitive data from your organization.
• There are five insider types to watch for: negligent, malicious, compromised, departing employees, and third-party vendors.
• Warning signs include after-hours data access, unauthorized USB usage, and accessing files outside normal job functions.
• Prevention requires least privilege access, DLP tools, strong offboarding, and continuous credential monitoring.
• When employee credentials appear in stealer logs, it may indicate an infected endpoint that requires immediate investigation.
Malicious insider attacks cost organizations $4.92 million on average, according to the 2025 IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report. That’s the second highest cost of any breach type.
The challenge is that insiders already have legitimate access. They don’t need to break through your perimeter defenses. They walk through the front door with valid credentials and authorized access to sensitive systems.
Preventing employee data theft requires a different approach than defending against external attackers. You can’t just block access. You need visibility into how employees use their access and detection when that access becomes compromised.
This guide covers eight strategies to prevent data theft by employees, from access controls to credential monitoring. You’ll learn the warning signs of insider threats and what to do when you suspect an employee is stealing data.
Before diving into prevention strategies, it’s important to understand what employee data theft actually means and why it’s different from external attacks.
Employee data theft occurs when current or former employees steal sensitive company information. This includes customer data and trade secrets. Financial records and intellectual property are also common targets. Theft can be deliberate by a malicious insider or result from compromised credentials when an attacker uses a stolen employee login.
Not all insider threats look the same. There are five distinct types that security teams need to address.
Negligent insiders accidentally create security risks through carelessness or lack of awareness. They fall for phishing and use weak passwords. This is the most common type.
Malicious insiders deliberately steal or leak data. Their motivations range from financial gain to revenge for perceived mistreatment. They’re dangerous because they have legitimate access and often understand your internal security defenses.
Compromised insiders have had their credentials stolen by external attackers. This happens through phishing and infostealer malware. The attacker exploits the employee’s access without their knowledge, making detection difficult.
Departing employees pose unique risks during their transition out. Studies show a significant percentage take proprietary data when leaving, whether for competitive advantage or as an “insurance policy.”
Third-party insiders include contractors and vendors with privileged access. The Verizon 2025 DBIR shows an increase in partner actors committing privilege misuse, making this category increasingly important.
For a deeper look at how these insider types cause breaches, see our guide on insider data breaches.
Detecting insider threats early requires monitoring for both behavioral and technical indicators. Neither alone tells the full story.
Changes in employee behavior often precede data theft. Watch for:
Unusual work hours. Employees accessing systems late at night or on weekends when they normally don’t may be attempting to avoid detection.
Job dissatisfaction. Employees who’ve been passed over for promotion or received negative performance reviews are at higher risk.
Financial stress. Sudden financial problems can motivate employees to sell company data. Unexplained wealth can indicate they already have.
Resignation announcement. The period between resignation and departure is high-risk. Some employees download data immediately after giving notice.
Technical monitoring catches what behavioral observation misses:
Accessing files outside their job function. An accountant accessing engineering documents or a salesperson downloading HR records should trigger alerts.
Unusual data volumes. Large downloads or bulk file transfers, especially to external drives or cloud storage, warrant investigation.
Unauthorized USB devices. Personal USB drives being connected to corporate systems are a classic exfiltration method.
Disabled security tools. Employees turning off endpoint protection or DLP tools may be preparing to move data undetected.
Credential sharing or anomalies. Multiple failed login attempts or credentials being used from unusual locations may indicate compromise rather than malicious intent.
Prevention requires multiple layers. No single control stops all insider threats, but the right combination dramatically reduces risk.
The principle of least privilege limits each employee’s access to only what they need for their job. This constrains the damage any single insider can cause.
Role-based access controls assign permissions based on job function, not individual requests. When employees change roles, their access changes automatically.
Regular access reviews identify accounts with excessive permissions. Quarterly reviews catch privilege creep before it becomes a security risk.
Just-in-time privileged access grants administrative rights only when needed and revokes them automatically. This reduces the window of opportunity for misuse.
DLP tools monitor and control data movement across your organization. They catch both intentional theft and accidental leakage.
Content inspection examines files for sensitive data like SSNs and credit card numbers before they leave your network.
Policy enforcement blocks transfers that violate security rules. You can prevent sensitive files from being uploaded to personal cloud storage or emailed to external addresses.
Visibility into data flows shows where sensitive information goes and who accesses it. This supports both prevention and investigation.
When employee credentials appear on the dark web, it often indicates a security problem you didn’t know existed.
Credential monitoring continuously scans third-party breaches and infostealer logs for your organization's exposed employee credentials. When passwords appear in stealer output, it may indicate a compromised endpoint whose credentials attackers are already selling.
Credentials leak through multiple channels. Third-party breaches expose passwords when employees reuse them across services. Infostealer malware harvests credentials directly from infected devices. Phishing attacks capture them in real-time.
Compromised credential monitoring detects this exposure early. When an employee’s credentials appear in stealer logs, it signals that their device may be infected. That’s both an insider threat (compromised insider) and a potential external attack vector.
The period when employees leave is high-risk. Strong offboarding procedures limit the opportunity for data theft.
Immediate access revocation should happen the moment termination is decided, not after the employee’s last day. For resignations, consider limiting access during the notice period.
Exit interviews about data handling remind employees of their confidentiality obligations and give them an opportunity to disclose any data they may have taken inadvertently.
Device collection and wiping ensures corporate data doesn’t walk out the door on employee laptops or phones.
Activity monitoring during the notice period can catch exfiltration attempts. Watch for unusual downloads or transfers to personal accounts.
Most insider incidents stem from negligence, not malice. Training addresses this root cause.
Phishing recognition helps employees avoid the attacks that lead to credential theft. Regular simulated phishing exercises identify who needs additional training.
Password hygiene reduces the risk of credential reuse. Require password managers so employees can use strong, unique passwords for every service without memorizing them.
Reporting culture encourages employees to report suspicious behavior from coworkers. Make it easy and non-punitive.
For more on preventing the human errors that lead to breaches, see data breach human error.
User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) tools establish baseline behavior patterns and alert on anomalies.
Baseline profiling learns what normal activity looks like for each employee. When behavior deviates significantly, it triggers investigation.
Risk scoring prioritizes alerts based on the severity and confidence of detected anomalies. Security teams can focus on the highest-risk indicators.
Correlation connects multiple weak signals into stronger indicators. An employee accessing unusual files after announcing resignation is more concerning than either signal alone.
Policies set expectations and enable enforcement. Without clear policies, you can’t hold employees accountable.
Acceptable use policies define what employees can and can’t do with corporate data. Be specific about personal devices and cloud storage.
Data classification helps employees understand which information is sensitive. Clear labels guide appropriate handling.
Consequences for policy violations must be documented and enforced consistently. Policies without enforcement are just suggestions.
Regular acknowledgment ensures employees can’t claim ignorance. Annual policy review and sign-off creates an audit trail.
Prevention isn’t perfect. Detection catches what prevention misses.
Network traffic analysis identifies unusual data flows. Large outbound transfers to external destinations or unfamiliar cloud services warrant investigation.
Endpoint monitoring provides visibility into what happens on employee devices. Watch for suspicious file operations and disabled security tools.
Dark web monitoring detects when your data or credentials appear on criminal marketplaces. Dark web monitoring can catch breaches before you even know they happened.
Audit log analysis reveals patterns that individual alerts miss. Correlating authentication logs and file access logs can uncover coordinated activity.
The goal is reducing dwell time. The faster you detect insider activity, the less damage it can cause.
When you suspect an employee of stealing data, remember to balance your investigation with legal and HR constraints.
Gather evidence discreetly before taking action. Review access logs and email records. Document everything. Premature confrontation can lead to evidence destruction.
Involve legal counsel and HR early. Employment law varies by jurisdiction. You need guidance on what investigation methods are permissible and what documentation is required.
Preserve forensic data. Ensure logs aren’t overwritten and devices aren’t wiped. Consider engaging a forensics firm if the situation is serious.
Assess the scope. Determine what data was accessed and whether it left the network. Track where it may have gone. This informs both remediation and potential notification obligations.
Remediate access immediately if the risk is high. Revoke credentials and disable accounts. For ongoing investigations, you may need to balance this against not tipping off the employee.
Consider law enforcement for significant theft, especially if trade secrets or customer data are involved. Early engagement makes prosecution more viable.
For a broader view of breach response, see our data breach prevention guide.
Preventing data theft by employees requires a fundamentally different approach than defending against external attackers. Insiders already have access. Your job is to ensure they use it appropriately and to detect when they don’t.
Key takeaways:
The connection between credential exposure and insider threats is often overlooked. When employee credentials appear in stealer logs or breach databases, it’s a signal that requires investigation. That employee’s device may be infected, or an external attacker may already be using their access.
Check your organization’s dark web exposure to see if employee credentials are circulating on criminal marketplaces.
Negligent insiders cause more incidents than malicious ones. These employees accidentally expose data through poor security hygiene and falling for phishing. The Verizon 2025 DBIR found that unintentional errors happen roughly twice as often as deliberate insider schemes. However, malicious insiders cause more damage per incident because they target high-value data intentionally.
Watch for behavioral and technical indicators. Behavioral signs include accessing data after hours and downloading unusual amounts of files. Technical indicators include unauthorized USB drives and accessing files outside normal job functions. Data breach detection tools can automate monitoring for these patterns.
Gather evidence discreetly before confronting the employee. Involve legal counsel and HR early. Preserve forensic data including access logs and email records. Consider whether law enforcement involvement is appropriate. Revoke or limit the employee’s access immediately if the risk is high, but balance this against tipping them off before you’ve collected evidence.
Yes. The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) criminalizes unauthorized access to computer systems. Trade secret laws like the Defend Trade Secrets Act provide civil and criminal remedies for theft of proprietary information. Many states also have laws against employee theft of intellectual property. Prosecution typically requires clear evidence of intent and actual harm to the organization.
Common methods include emailing files to personal accounts and copying data to USB drives. Cloud uploads and screenshots are also popular. Some employees download large amounts of data in the weeks before announcing their departure. Strong data leak prevention and monitoring departing employee activity during the notice period can catch these exfiltration attempts.
Use Data Loss Prevention (DLP) software to block unauthorized transfers. Add UEBA to detect anomalous activity. Compromised credential monitoring adds another layer by detecting when employee credentials appear in stealer logs, which may indicate a compromised endpoint.

Dark Web Monitoring Credential Monitoring Data Breach
What Are Leaked Emails? Most security teams think about leaked emails as a consumer problem. Check your personal email …

Credential Monitoring Dark Web Monitoring Data Breach Security Tools
What Are Dark Web Credential Monitoring Tools? Dark web credential monitoring tools scan criminal sources for exposed …