Insider threats now cost organizations $17.4 million annually to resolve. That’s a 109% increase since 2018, according to the Ponemon Institute.
• Insider threats are employees or contractors who misuse their access, either intentionally or through negligence
• Credential-based attacks mimic insider behavior and evade traditional detection tools
• Prevention requires DLP, access controls, security training, and credential monitoring working together
• Detection takes 81 days on average. Credential monitoring catches attacks faster by detecting stolen passwords before they’re used
Most prevention guides focus on catching malicious employees. But there’s a threat they miss: external attackers with stolen credentials look identical to insiders. Same valid logins. Same normal data access patterns. Your DLP tools can’t tell the difference.
This guide covers both. You’ll learn how to stop internal data theft from actual insider threats and from credential-based attacks that mimic insider behavior.
An insider threat is a current or former employee, contractor, or business partner who misuses their authorized access to harm your organization. The threat comes from someone on the inside, not an external attacker.
An **insider threat** is a person with legitimate access who intentionally or accidentally causes harm to their organization's data, systems, or operations. Insider threats cause internal data theft, data exposure, and system sabotage.
Insider threats fall into two categories:
Malicious insiders intentionally commit employee data theft. A disgruntled employee downloads customer databases before quitting. A sales rep takes client lists to a competitor. Someone sells trade secrets for profit. According to IBM’s Cost of a Data Breach Report 2025, malicious insider breaches cost $4.92 million on average.
Negligent insiders accidentally cause data exposure. They forward sensitive emails to the wrong recipient. They store confidential files in personal cloud accounts. They fall for phishing attacks that expose credentials. Negligent insiders cause 58% of insider incidents according to the Ponemon Institute.
There’s a related threat that insider detection tools often miss: external attackers using stolen credentials.
When attackers steal employee credentials through infostealers or phishing, they can log in as that employee. To your systems, it looks like legitimate insider activity. DLP tools see normal user behavior. But an external attacker is exfiltrating your data.
According to IBM’s X-Force Threat Intelligence Index 2025, 30% of attacks now use valid account credentials as the initial access vector. Infostealers delivered via phishing increased 84% year over year.
These aren’t insider threats by definition. The attacker is external. But they look identical to insider threats from a detection standpoint. That’s why effective prevention must address both.
Insider threats lead to data breaches through multiple exfiltration methods. Understanding these helps you detect employee data theft early.
Email forwarding remains the most common method. Insiders send sensitive files to personal Gmail or Yahoo accounts. Some set up automatic forwarding rules that persist even after they lose access.
Cloud storage uploads are increasingly popular. Employees upload files to personal Dropbox, Google Drive, or OneDrive accounts. Shadow IT makes this hard to detect.
Removable media enables physical removal. USB drives and external hard drives can hold millions of documents.
Credential-based attacks use the same channels. When attackers have valid employee credentials, they access data through normal methods. The stolen credentials appear on dark web markets within hours. Attackers buy them in bulk. Then they log in as your employees.
Session token theft makes credential attacks worse. Attackers steal cookies that prove a user already authenticated. They bypass MFA entirely. According to SpyCloud’s 2025 Identity Exposure Report, session hijacking via stolen cookies ranks as the second-highest attack concern after ransomware.
Catching insider threats early limits damage from internal data theft. Watch for these behavioral and technical indicators.
Unusual work hours often precede employee data theft. Employees who suddenly work late nights or weekends without clear business reasons may be preparing to exfiltrate data. This is especially concerning during notice periods.
Expressing discontent matters for context. Employees who feel mistreated, passed over for promotion, or about to be terminated warrant closer monitoring. The Ponemon Institute found that 56% of insider threat incidents involved employees who had expressed discontent.
Accessing systems outside normal role is a red flag. When a marketing employee suddenly accesses engineering databases, investigate.
Resignation signals trigger higher risk. The period between resignation and departure is peak time for employee data theft. Two weeks’ notice gives plenty of time to exfiltrate data systematically.
Excessive downloads stand out against normal patterns. User behavior analytics can baseline typical activity and flag anomalies.
Email forwarding to personal accounts is highly suspicious. Check for forwarding rules in email systems. Monitor for attachments sent to non-corporate domains.
Login anomalies include off-hours access, unfamiliar locations, and impossible travel. If someone logs in from New York, then from Singapore an hour later, investigate immediately. This could indicate a credential-based attack.
These indicators help you catch credential theft before attackers can mimic insider behavior.
Credentials appearing on dark web mean employee accounts are compromised. Credential monitoring detects when your employees’ passwords appear in breach databases or stealer logs.
Infostealer logs containing employee data confirm endpoint compromise. If an employee’s device ID appears in stealer logs, their credentials are in attacker hands.
Effective insider threat prevention combines technical controls, process improvements, and external monitoring to stop internal data theft.
Start with limiting access to reduce insider threat risk. Employees should only be able to access data they need for their current role.
Implement role-based access controls (RBAC) that tie permissions to job functions. When roles change, access should update automatically.
Review access regularly through formal recertification. Managers should verify their team’s access quarterly.
Separate duties for sensitive functions. No single person should control an entire critical process. This limits what any single insider threat can accomplish.
DLP tools monitor data movement and enforce policies to prevent insider threats from causing data breaches.
Content inspection examines files for sensitive data patterns. Social security numbers, credit card numbers, and proprietary markers trigger alerts when insiders attempt exfiltration.
Endpoint DLP watches local activity. It can block USB transfers, restrict printing, and monitor clipboard activity. This catches employee data theft at the point of exfiltration.
Network DLP examines traffic leaving your network. It catches insiders uploading data to unauthorized cloud services.
The limitation: DLP sees activity as the authorized user. When attackers use stolen credentials, DLP sees what looks like legitimate access. You need additional layers.
Training addresses negligent insider threats and reduces credential theft.
Phishing recognition is critical. Phishing delivers infostealers that capture credentials. Employees who recognize suspicious emails don’t click malicious links.
Data handling procedures teach employees what’s sensitive and how to protect it. Many insider threat incidents happen because employees don’t realize information is confidential.
The departure period is highest risk for employee data theft. Structured offboarding reduces exposure.
Immediate access revocation should happen the moment employment ends. Prepare access termination in advance so it executes instantly.
Device collection and wiping prevents data leaving on company equipment.
Exit interviews may reveal concerns about data handling or potential insider threats.
This addresses the credential-based attacks that mimic insider behavior. Your DLP and access controls won’t catch attackers using valid credentials. You need to know when credentials are stolen.
Dark web monitoring detects when employee credentials appear in breach databases and stealer logs. Real-time alerts enable immediate password resets before attackers can use them.
Infostealer channel monitoring specifically tracks logs from malware families like RedLine and Vidar. When employee device IDs appear, you know credentials and session tokens were harvested.
According to IBM’s Cost of a Data Breach Report 2025, compromised credentials take an average of 186 days to identify. Credential monitoring shrinks that window dramatically.
Prevention isn’t perfect. You need detection capabilities to catch insider threats that bypass controls.
User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) baselines normal activity and flags anomalies. It learns what’s typical for each user and alerts on deviations.
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) aggregates logs across systems. Correlation rules identify suspicious patterns.
Database activity monitoring watches queries against sensitive data stores. Unusual query patterns or bulk exports trigger investigation.
Internal monitoring can’t distinguish between actual insiders and attackers using stolen credentials. External intelligence fills the gap.
Dark web monitoring finds your data on criminal markets. If customer records appear for sale, you have a breach to investigate.
Credential monitoring detects leaked passwords before attackers use them. Force resets immediately when credentials appear.
Despite best efforts, insider threats cause data breaches. Your response determines the ultimate damage.
Preserve evidence before making changes. Image relevant systems. Preserve logs. Work with legal counsel to ensure evidence is admissible.
Assess scope to determine severity. What data was accessed? What was exfiltrated? How long did the activity continue?
Coordinate with HR and legal before confronting subjects. Employment law governs what actions you can take. Criminal referral may be appropriate for serious employee data theft cases.
Fix control gaps that enabled the incident. Use the breach as a learning opportunity to improve prevention.
These cases illustrate how insider threats cause employee data theft in practice.
A former employee accessed and exfiltrated customer records after leaving Block, the parent company. This insider threat affected 8 million customers.
The failure: Access wasn’t revoked promptly upon departure.
The lesson: Immediate access revocation at termination is non-negotiable for preventing employee data theft.
Two former Tesla employees leaked personal data of 75,000 employees to a German news outlet. The insiders transferred the data before leaving.
The failure: DLP controls didn’t catch the exfiltration during notice periods.
The lesson: Departing employees warrant elevated monitoring to prevent internal data theft.
Attackers used phone phishing to trick Twitter employees into providing credentials. With those credentials, attackers accessed 130 high-profile accounts and ran a Bitcoin scam.
The failure: Employees weren’t trained to verify credential requests from supposed IT support.
The lesson: This wasn’t an insider threat. It was a credential-based attack that mimicked insider access. Training must address social engineering, and organizations need credential monitoring to detect when employees are compromised.
Insider threat prevention requires addressing malicious insiders and negligent insiders. But it also requires detecting credential-based attacks that look identical to insider activity.
Technical controls form the foundation. Access controls limit what insiders can reach. DLP tools detect policy violations. Monitoring capabilities flag suspicious behavior.
But these controls can’t distinguish between an actual insider and an attacker using stolen credentials. Both look like legitimate user activity.
Credential monitoring closes this gap. Dark web monitoring detects when employee passwords appear in breaches. Infostealer channel monitoring catches credential harvesting in real time. You can force password resets before attackers use the stolen credentials.
Key takeaways:
Want to know if your employees’ credentials are already exposed? Check your organization’s dark web exposure to find leaked credentials before attackers use them.
An insider threat is a current or former employee, contractor, or business partner who misuses their authorized access to harm your organization. This includes malicious insiders who steal data intentionally and negligent insiders who cause breaches through carelessness. The key distinction is that the threat comes from someone on the inside. Insider threat indicators help you spot these risks early.
A departing employee downloading customer databases before their last day is a classic example of employee data theft. Cash App experienced this in 2022 when a former employee accessed records of 8 million customers after leaving. Another example is a negligent insider who falls for a phishing email and accidentally exposes sensitive data. Both cause breaches, but one is intentional and the other is careless.
There are two main types. Malicious insiders deliberately steal or sabotage data for personal gain, revenge, or competitive advantage. Negligent insiders accidentally cause breaches through carelessness like clicking phishing links or mishandling sensitive data. Malicious insiders cost $4.92 million per incident on average. Negligent insiders are more common, causing 58% of insider incidents.
Look for behavioral and technical indicators together. Behavioral signs include unusual work hours, accessing systems outside normal job duties, and expressing discontent. Technical signs include excessive downloads, email forwarding to personal accounts, and login anomalies. Dark web monitoring helps detect credential theft that could lead to attacks mimicking insider behavior.
Email forwarding to personal accounts is the most common exfiltration method for employee data theft. Employees send sensitive files to personal Gmail or Yahoo accounts before leaving. USB drives and cloud storage uploads like personal Dropbox are also popular. Insiders typically use their normal access to download data through legitimate channels, which makes detection difficult.
Stopping insider threats requires layered defenses. Implement least-privilege access controls so employees only reach data they need. Deploy DLP tools to detect unusual data movement and train employees on phishing recognition. Monitor for compromised credentials to catch credential-based attacks that mimic insider behavior. Have clear offboarding procedures that revoke access immediately.
Data Breach Case Studies Healthcare Security Ransomware Credential Theft
What Happened in the Change Healthcare Breach? On February 21, 2024, Change Healthcare detected ransomware deployed …
Data Breach Case Studies Session Hijacking Identity Security MFA Bypass
What Happened in the Okta Data Breach? Okta serves over 18,000 customers as a critical identity infrastructure provider. …