
Account Takeover Prevention: How to Stop ATO Attacks
Authentication Dark Web Cyberattack Trends
What Is Account Takeover Prevention? Your organization’s credentials are already on the dark web. The question is …

Learn how third-party vendor credentials led to one of retail’s largest breaches.
• Stolen vendor credentials gave attackers network access. Limit and monitor third-party access to prevent similar breaches.
• An expired SSL certificate disabled monitoring for months. Monitor your security tools, not just security threats.
• Basic failures cost Home Depot $179 million. Patching and certificate management would have stopped this attack.
• Attackers moved from a vendor portal to POS systems across 2,200 stores. Segment payment systems from your general network.
In 2014, Home Depot suffered one of the largest retail data breaches in history. Attackers stole 56 million payment cards over five months.
The attackers gained access through a third-party vendor’s stolen credentials. Once inside, they deployed custom malware on self-checkout systems across 2,200 stores.
The breach cost Home Depot $179 million in settlements. But the reputational damage lasted far longer.
Here’s exactly how the attack happened and what you can learn from it.
The Home Depot data breach was one of the largest retail security incidents in history. In September 2014, the company confirmed attackers had stolen data on 56 million customers.
In retail breaches like this one, attackers typically target point-of-sale systems to capture credit card data during transactions.
A data breach occurs when attackers gain unauthorized access to systems and steal sensitive information. Unlike accidental data leaks, breaches involve intentional intrusion and data theft.
Attackers had been inside Home Depot’s network for five months before detection. They installed custom malware on self-checkout terminals across 2,200 US and Canadian stores.
The breach was discovered after stolen cards started appearing on underground markets. Banks traced the fraud back to Home Depot transactions.
At the time, it was the largest retail card breach ever recorded, surpassing even the Target data breach from the previous year.
Here’s how the attack unfolded:
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| April 2014 | Attackers compromise a third-party vendor’s credentials |
| April 2014 | Attackers gain access to Home Depot’s network |
| April-May 2014 | Attackers move laterally and exploit Windows vulnerability |
| May 2014 | Custom POS malware deployed to self-checkout systems |
| May-September 2014 | Malware captures 56 million card numbers |
| September 2, 2014 | Banks detect fraud pattern linked to Home Depot |
| September 8, 2014 | Home Depot publicly confirms the breach |
| November 2014 | Home Depot reveals 53 million emails also stolen |
| March 2016 | Home Depot settles with banks for $25 million |
| November 2020 | Home Depot pays $17.5 million customer settlement |
The IBM Cost of a Data Breach report shows a direct correlation between detection time and breach costs. Home Depot’s five-month detection gap allowed attackers to steal data from millions of transactions.
The attack followed a common pattern: compromise a vendor, exploit trust, move laterally, deploy malware.
Attackers stole login credentials from a third-party vendor that had legitimate access to Home Depot’s network. This vendor relationship gave attackers a foothold inside the perimeter.
A third-party breach occurs when attackers compromise a vendor or partner to gain access to their target’s systems. Vendors often have legitimate network access, which creates potential attack paths.
According to Brian Krebs, banks first identified the breach after noticing fraud patterns linked to Home Depot transactions.
Once inside, attackers exploited a vulnerability in Microsoft Windows to gain elevated privileges. This allowed them to move freely through the network without triggering alerts.
They specifically targeted self-checkout systems rather than staffed registers. Self-checkout lanes process high transaction volumes with less oversight.
The attackers deployed custom-built malware designed to evade antivirus detection. The malware captured card data from memory when customers swiped their cards.
Stolen data was encrypted and transmitted to attacker-controlled servers. The encryption helped the data blend in with normal network traffic.
The breach exposed two types of customer data:
Payment Card Data (56 million records):
Email Addresses (53 million records):
The stolen card data appeared for sale on underground markets within days of the breach becoming public. Cards sold for $9-50 each depending on card type and available credit.
Email addresses enabled follow-up phishing attacks. Criminals sent fake Home Depot emails to victims, attempting to steal additional information.
The attackers were never publicly identified or charged.
Security researchers linked the attack to a group of Russian and Ukrainian criminals. The same group allegedly breached Target (40 million cards) and Sally Beauty (25,000 cards). The malware used in the Home Depot attack shared code with malware from these other breaches.
No arrests were made in connection with the Home Depot breach specifically. The attackers likely operated from jurisdictions without US extradition treaties.
Home Depot’s total breach costs exceeded $179 million:
Customer Settlement: $17.5 million Home Depot compensated customers for unauthorized charges and paid for identity theft protection. The settlement also funded credit monitoring services.
Banks and Credit Card Companies: $134.5 million This covered fraudulent charges and card replacement costs. Banks had to reissue millions of compromised cards.
Financial Institution Settlement: $27 million Additional payments to banks and credit unions for breach-related losses.
Security Upgrades: Unknown (estimated $100+ million) Home Depot added stronger encryption and new POS terminals with chip-and-PIN. They also set up better network monitoring. These investments continued for years after the breach.
Legal and Investigation Costs: Unknown Home Depot faced lawsuits from customers and banks. Shareholders filed suits too. Regulatory inquiries and forensic investigations drove costs higher.
For context on breach costs, see our analysis of data breach costs across industries.
Investigation and Disclosure Home Depot brought in forensic investigators and contacted law enforcement. They announced the breach on September 8, 2014, shortly after banks spotted the fraud pattern.
Customer Notification Home Depot told affected customers and offered free credit monitoring and identity protection. They set up a website with information and resources.
Security Upgrades Home Depot made several security changes:
EMV Chip Card Adoption Home Depot sped up its switch to EMV chip card readers. Chip cards are harder to counterfeit than magnetic stripe cards, so stolen card data is worth less.
Yes. In 2024, a security researcher discovered a separate vulnerability exposing Home Depot’s internal systems.
According to TechCrunch, an exposed access token had been giving access to Home Depot’s GitHub source code repositories and other internal cloud systems for about a year.
The researcher attempted to notify Home Depot about the exposure. The company reportedly ignored these notifications until TechCrunch published the story in December 2025.
This incident is separate from the 2014 breach but raises questions about Home Depot’s ongoing security practices. Exposed source code could reveal vulnerabilities that attackers might exploit.
The Home Depot breach highlighted several critical security gaps:
Third-party vendors created the initial attack path. You need to:
For more on managing this risk, see how to prevent third-party data breaches.
Once inside, attackers moved freely through Home Depot’s network. Proper segmentation would have:
Five months of undetected access allowed massive data theft. You need:
Point-to-point encryption would have made stolen data unusable. Modern POS systems should encrypt card data immediately upon capture.
A documented data breach response plan helps you react faster when breaches happen.
The Home Depot breach was preventable with standard security practices:
Monitor Vendor Access Treat vendor credentials as high-risk. Monitor for unusual access patterns and require MFA.
Segment Your Network Isolate payment systems from general corporate networks. Attackers shouldn’t be able to reach POS systems from vendor access points.
Deploy Modern Endpoint Protection Traditional antivirus missed the custom malware. Modern endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools are more effective against unknown threats.
Monitor for Leaked Credentials Attackers often obtain credentials from previous breaches before launching new attacks. Dark web monitoring detects exposed credentials so you can reset them before attackers exploit them.
Test Your Defenses Regular penetration testing identifies vulnerabilities before attackers do.
The Home Depot data breach exposed 56 million payment cards and cost the company $179 million. A stolen vendor credential gave attackers access. Five months of undetected access made the breach catastrophic.
The 2024 security exposure shows that even companies that suffered major breaches can have ongoing security gaps. Continuous monitoring and rapid response matter as much as prevention.
Protect your organization by monitoring for leaked credentials and third-party breach exposure. Book a demo to see how Breachsense can help detect exposed data before attackers exploit it.
Attackers first accessed Home Depot’s network in April 2014. They installed malware and began stealing card data. The breach wasn’t detected until September 2014, five months later. Home Depot publicly disclosed the breach on September 8, 2014.
56 million credit and debit cards were stolen. 53 million customer email addresses were also exposed. The breach affected customers who shopped at Home Depot stores in the US and Canada between April and September 2014.
Attackers stole login credentials from a third-party vendor that had access to Home Depot’s network. They used these credentials to get inside, then exploited a Windows vulnerability to move through the network and install malware on point-of-sale systems.
Home Depot paid $179 million total. The largest portion was $134.5 million to credit card companies and banks. Another $27 million went to financial institutions. Affected customers received $17.5 million. Additional costs covered security upgrades and legal fees.
In 2024, a security researcher discovered an exposed access token. It had been giving access to Home Depot’s internal systems, including GitHub repositories, for about a year. The researcher reported the issue, but Home Depot initially ignored the notifications. TechCrunch broke the story in December 2025.
Segment payment systems from your general network so attackers can’t reach POS terminals from vendor access points. Require MFA for all vendor access. Monitor your security tools, not just threats. An expired certificate disabled Home Depot’s monitoring for months. Patch critical vulnerabilities within 48 hours.

Authentication Dark Web Cyberattack Trends
What Is Account Takeover Prevention? Your organization’s credentials are already on the dark web. The question is …

Dark Web Monitoring Best Practices
What Is Dark Web Monitoring for Business? Most security teams understand dark web monitoring in theory. The execution is …